Dimsum masthead
Democracy in Britain threatened?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dimsum Forum Index -> Community
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 12:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Im not interested in this nazi or his movie. I get the impression he is a self-serving bigot and I dont care what happens to him.

What does annoy me is being told that we cannot permit something because it against "the policy of the west" (whatever that might be). Such behaviour is merely an excuse for outright repression of any disenting view. That is how we got into an unnecessary war in the first place.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
zombiehellmonkey



Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 195

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:17 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree Edwina.

I wonder how the views would change in this forum if he had, instead, made a movie misrepresenting the Chinese?

Perhaps his next movie will be about the Chinese?

Whatever the case, it's important to be empathic towards those who the film would affect.

Racists don't deserve rights.
_________________
Coming to Hong Kong? Join my expat group for fun and networking! http://www.meetup.com/expats-HK/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

But what defines a racist? someone proposing a "Final Solution" or the grandmother who looks at you in a funny way?

Personally I could have coped but would have been angry and descend into ridiucle of the message.

Racists I can cope with. I find religion the most insidious thing. We can freely reject all kinds of political nonscene but we find ourselves nodding politely when we are told the most hideous evil in the name of religion. Why is this?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Edwina Lee



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1282
Location: High Wycombe, UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 10:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunxueping wrote:
Im not interested in this nazi or his movie. I get the impression he is a self-serving bigot and I dont care what happens to him.

What does annoy me is being told that we cannot permit something because it against "the policy of the west" (whatever that might be). Such behaviour is merely an excuse for outright repression of any disenting view. That is how we got into an unnecessary war in the first place.

XuePing,
He has not been banned from expressing his views, nor have we been banned from listening to his views.
It is just that he can't show it in the House of Lords.
You can watch his movie on Youtube if you like.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Edwina Lee



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1282
Location: High Wycombe, UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

zombiehellmonkey wrote:
I agree Edwina.

I wonder how the views would change in this forum if he had, instead, made a movie misrepresenting the Chinese?

Perhaps his next movie will be about the Chinese?

Whatever the case, it's important to be empathic towards those who the film would affect.

Racists don't deserve rights.

Zombiehellmonkey,
If he is tackling a problem in physical science or mathematics, the approach of his film would be an honest exposition of what he thinks.
However, he is dealing with masses of population in the field of politics/religion; his action affects the perception and behaviour of the masses, and the relationships between nations.
This is why he cannot show it in the House of Lords - the pinnacle body of policy/law making of the UK.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Edwina Lee



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1282
Location: High Wycombe, UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:32 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunxueping wrote:
But what defines a racist? someone proposing a "Final Solution" or the grandmother who looks at you in a funny way?

Personally I could have coped but would have been angry and descend into ridiucle of the message.

Racists I can cope with. I find religion the most insidious thing. We can freely reject all kinds of political nonsense but we find ourselves nodding politely when we are told the most hideous evil in the name of religion. Why is this?


XuePing,

As I understand, in various religious texts, there are many things which taken literally, are seriously horrible and terrifying.

However, the practice of religion involves lots of holy interpreters. It is therefore very important to see religious practice not just in terms of what is said in the religious texts.

The Channel 4 documentary : Rome - the power & the glory showed how christianity was promoted by Constantine to displace paganism and united the Roman empire before its fall.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh come on. Since when was the the House of Lords - the pinnacle body of policy/law making of the UK?

The recent scandals involving expenses and bribes and "Abuse of Privilege" has shown the HoLs for what it really is...

That is the problem with UK. Literally everyone is a Lord, Lady, Sir, Baron or whatever for the most feeble example of self-serving sycophancy towards the currently elected party.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Edwina Lee



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1282
Location: High Wycombe, UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 11:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

(Censored) Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
zombiehellmonkey



Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 195

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunxueping wrote:
What does annoy me is being told that we cannot permit something because it against "the policy of the west" (whatever that might be). Such behaviour is merely an excuse for outright repression of any disenting view.



I think this case is unique, besides that Wilders w*nker is not a British subject - if he was British, he might have been treated differently. The last thing we need is a foreign politician calling all the shots. Nobody invited him to the UK, and nobody asked for his views. Bloody w*nker.
_________________
Coming to Hong Kong? Join my expat group for fun and networking! http://www.meetup.com/expats-HK/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Very wise Edwina

But ZombieHM, I think he was invited by the HoLs so err... where does that leave the UK?

On the other hand I think worse people than him have addressed the UK Parliament and even stayed with the Queen.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
zombiehellmonkey



Joined: 27 Sep 2008
Posts: 195

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

chunxueping wrote:
On the other hand I think worse people than him have addressed the UK Parliament and even stayed with the Queen.


Yeah like that fucking w*nker nazi husband of hers.

Laughing
_________________
Coming to Hong Kong? Join my expat group for fun and networking! http://www.meetup.com/expats-HK/
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 1:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ah not to use bad language. Not deserve that.

I always remember feeling of pride when I learn during Queen Elizabeth's visit to China in 1986 that a humble interpreter refused to bow to her as Chinese people bow to no one. I was amazed to think that a Chinese woman have such courage. How far we have travelled.

Many years later I write to that interpreter and learn her story. She is very kind person and just say it seemed the right thing to do at the time.

I treasure her response to this day.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Edwina Lee



Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1282
Location: High Wycombe, UK

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

zombiehellmonkey wrote:
chunxueping wrote:
On the other hand I think worse people than him have addressed the UK Parliament and even stayed with the Queen.


Yeah like that fucking w*nker nazi husband of hers.

Laughing

Zombiehellmonkey,

RESPECT is an important social agenda in the UK today.

When you make insults for the fun of it, you show disrespect. In turn, people disrespect you for good reasons too.

Edwina
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
Lois Hashimoto



Joined: 26 Jul 2007
Posts: 25
Location: Laval, QC,Canada

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 3:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I cannot disagree with anything you say, Edwina,You do the research, and your opinions are based on factual truths, not "feelings", and that's what makes your posts here so valuable.

I'm not British, and I am not familiar with the function and procedures of the House of Lords, and so I understand that I seem presumptous and ignorantly susceptible to propaganda in insisting that the main reason Wilder was "uninvited" was the threat of a very negative--even violent--reaction from the Islam extremists. That a country like Britain-- who took up arms against the Nazis long before America did--is afraid to show a ten minute film that can be seen on the internet by anyone who is interested, is what is chilling.

And at this point, let me address Zombiemomkey: almost 400,000 British soldiers died fighting the war against Nazi Germany and imperialist Japan, both notoriously racists --so that someone like you can today enjoy the freedom to call Britain a "racist" country, without any fear. You, my dear Zombie, have no idea of what the freedoms you take so much for granted cost.


Wilder's film is accused of being selective in its Koran quotation.Of course it is! They are the same selective quotations that the Jihadists use to promote their cause of world domination.


Listen to Wilder's words. Where do you find the racism, Xue-Ping? Is he promoting hatred against Muslims? If you believe Islam Jihadists represent all Muslims, then who, really, is the racist here? Of course you are not a racist,Xue-Ping --I know that-you are one of the most passionately just person I know- but do you not see how tolerating intolerance in the name of "racial harmony" can do? Ordinary, peace loving Muslims are most likely to be subject to Islamic injustice.


Wilder has watched helplessly as he has seen his once beautiful and tolernt freedom-loving country turn into a place quite different-- unrecognizable from what it was not so very long ago. It's now a place where you can be killed for publishing a cartoon that is offensive to some. Tolerance should work both ways, but more and more it doesn't.


Not long ago in Laval where I live, a young Muslim girl taking part in a soccer tournament was asked to remove her hajib because the soccer rules in this particular league does not permit any kind of head gear, for safety's sake. The referee who made the request was himself a Muslim. No matter. She refused, and all her teammates team quit the game to support her. This story of "Racism" became national news, and the ten-year old little girl became an instant heroine. When girls this young are so politcized, and the whole country applauds this little girl's "courage" in defending her religious freedom, it's time to start worrying.
_________________
LYH
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chunxueping



Joined: 24 Jun 2007
Posts: 749
Location: Beijing, PRC

PostPosted: Mon Feb 16, 2009 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I not thought I had mentioned racism as I not see the film and I normally very careful to distingush between race and religion. After re-reading my posts I find one conditional reference:

"I dont agree that violence would have been the result of a private showing of a short film in the House of Lords, very few people would have seen it. It more likely the film is boring, bigoted and self-serving but there is no oportunity to explore and ridicule the racist message it might portray. The Dutchman is now a martyr and the State has shown itself to be foolish and repressive."

This was not intentional. My concern here is the subversion of religion into an extremist act.

We have had similar thing in UK to Canada. A childs understanding of her religion to wear a headscarf, a cross or a symbolic bracelet is distorted by adults into a heroic defence of their religion. You wonder who actually are the Children and the Adults.

Incidently, I am frequently called a racist, usually by Chinese people for not provide unconditional support of PRC policies.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Dimsum Forum Index -> Community All times are GMT + 1 Hour
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Page 2 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum