Dimsum masthead
Home arrow Viewpoints arrow Too Clumsy to Handle China
Too Clumsy to Handle China PDF Print E-mail
Viewpoints
Monday, 11 January 2010

Too clumsy to handle China

By George Lee

One detail in the story of the execution of Akmal Shaikh in China this week has stayed with me, after all the bluster of "vile regimes" and lack of respect for human life has gone. It was the Chinese police's description of the 4kg of heroin he was caught carrying.

In the west such a seizure would be given a lurid six-digit "street value of...", the Chinese police described it as enough to have killed 27,000 people. A small distinction, but one that should give pause for thought to any politician who believes the West has a monopoly on correctly valuing human life.

To me the real scandal in this story was lost: the complete ineptitude of our own leaders in establishing a dialogue with, and understanding the concerns of a country already established as one of the global agenda-setters of  the 21st century.

There is no ambiguity on where I stand on the issue of Mr Shaikh - as a former police officer I am implacably opposed to capital punishment. But after being involved in making quiet representations to the Chinese ambassador on Mr Shaikh's behalf myself, I have been mortified by the very public and clumsy moves made by the Labour Government, from the belated efforts to present evidence of the London man's mental illness, to fatally misjudged attempts to publically embarrass the Chinese internationally.

Gordon Brown's personal letter asking for clemency may well have been too little too late, but since he nullified any impact it might have had by simultaneously blaming China for the failure of the Copenhagen environmental summit, we will never know.

Both the individual tragedy of Mr Shaikh's fate, and the broader issue of building a grown-up, mutually respectful relationship with the world's most populous state seemed to take a secondary role to the old-fashioned business of finding a foreign country to demonise.

The former US senator Lincoln Chafee's formulation that "In the world of diplomacy, some things are better left unsaid" seems to require a further refinement after these fumbles: that some politicians are better left unheard.

The hollowness to Chinese ears of the UK government's condemnation is clear when you understand that this is a culture that takes a long view of history, the humiliation of the Victorian era's Opium Wars in which Imperial Britain fought to continue peddling the drug to China is still raw.

And its legacy of an estimated 100 million opium users was a precursor to the state of anarchy and warlordism which persisted in China through the early 20th century (another unreported footnote to the case is that Mr Shaikh was arrested in the north west of China, where ethnic Uighur Islamist terrorist groups - some with links to al-Qaeda - have used drug monies to fund their campaigns) .

The Chinese never want to go back there, and their government's hard line on drugs enjoys plenty of popular support. As the Times reported last week, domestic internet forums discussing the story showed little sympathy for western efforts to save Mr Shaikh.

"China is not Qing any more; we decide what to do on our land," read one, a swipe at the corrupt dynasty that presided over China's 19th century decline. When the boxes of 21st century blogs are replete with such references, you begin to understand how in the 1960s the Chinese premier Zhou Enlai could declare that it was "too early to tell" what the lessons of the French revolution were!

Perhaps another clue to China's indifference to our lectures on morality, can be found in a recent survey in the Economist on the professions which dominate politics.

In stark contrast to the lawyers who have taken centre stage in the USA and Great Britain, the Chinese political leadership is dominated by engineers who perhaps care less about individual rights and wrongs, and more about taking the potentially unwieldy structure of 1.3 billion citizens and 56 distinct ethnic groups and turning it into something that works. They can point to some spectacular results, according to the World Bank, they have cut poverty rates from 53% of the population in 1981 to just 8% now.

Indeed it is an odd kind of pariah state, that has become both the biggest bankroller of US government debt with a holding of $800 billion in US treasury bonds, and a $400 billion lender in providing the economic stimulus to underpin all the fine words of last April's G20 meeting on the world recession. Small wonder that when China hears our politicians sounding off in the national press about it, it feels unappreciated. Always ready to help a friend in need out, only to be slandered to his family.

And maybe we should be a little more ready to listen and a little less eager to condemn on green issues. Prior to Copenhagen, China pledged to make a unilateral cut of 45% in carbon emissions with no strings attached. When 190 other countries and regions failed to agree on binding limits, China has more than enough reason to feel singled out.

On this issue alone there are strong pragmatic reasons to keep China on-side, the country has just become the world's second biggest spender on R&D, part of leader Hu Jintao's pledge to turn the country from a manufacturing power to an innovation-based economy. It has a particular focus on sustainable energy, and is also a pioneer of cleaner, safer pebble-bed nuclear reactors. It is amassing a bank of knowledge that a post-carbon world will have to draw heavily from.

Of course, we will frequently not see eye to eye with the Chinese government. But the foreign policy of the last decade has been dominated by two poorly run military adventures, conceived with the ambition of saddling other countries with our system of government, regardless of whether it fit.

Now seems a good time to draw a line underneath it, to begin to denounce a little less, and understand a little more. China would be the best possible place to start. We need a new kind of politics both in Westminster and on the international stage if we are to make this world a safer, fairer and greener place for our children.

George Lee

George Lee is currently standing for Conservative Parliamentary MP for Holborn and St.Pancras. 

 http://www.mygeorgelee.com/


 

 
Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
baixue Posted 13:34 on 20 January 2010
Why does the fact that Mr Shaikh was only permitted a twenty minute "trial" behind closed doors without a jury overlooked? I think that this - far more than his supposed inferior mental capacity - was a far greater violation here.

Chinese lawyers "care less about individual rights and wrongs"?!?! Ha! Try, "Chinese lawyers and the government to which they belong care less about individual rights full stop". Let's take the probably banning of Avatar in Chinese cinemas as an example. Lord forbid a movie should go against the propagandist line and call into question the displacement of people from their own homes.

The Chinese as a race are some of the most lovely you could ever meet, but their government is dangerous and brutal. Yes, they have to be strong to bring such a massive population into line, but that's no justification for a complete disregard for basic human rights adn the west's pussy-footing around them because of their economic strength.

This is just one big spiel of Chinese propagandism from a Tory no less!!
anon Posted 12:43 on 22 January 2010
cmon EVERYONE knows drugs are a touchy subject with the chinese, i mean for Britain to say give the man a chance, when they were the ones that forced Hong Kongers and Chinese to become opium addicts! they created a war when China threw the opium off the boats. Its a case of the pot calling the kettle black.
Agreed that human rights in CHina are non-existent. Its disgusting. i think living in China would be like living in a prison without walls. theyre there even though you cant see them
Tom Posted 2:54 on 31 January 2010
I lived in both countries, China and the UK. I have found that there is more freedom in China. What do you guys make of the British government ratifying the Lisbon treaty? All european countries loses it's sovereignty and 1 elected president plus the public are not allowed to vote? Why do they do that duhhhh?!? because they are smart even though they will create another China, but that's how a country with a large population 56 enthic groups should be ran. Human rights does exist in China. In the UK our freedom is restricted by high taxes..you cannot have total freedom without financial freedom. EVEN THE BASIC RIGHT OF TAKING MORE THAN 3K ABROAD IS NOT GRANTED IN THE UK!!! Actually the most dangerous and brutal country is USA dumb-ass.
Tom Posted 3:17 on 31 January 2010
Anyway, dumb-asses if China become like the west, the master of media influence, mass marketing their propaganda. Erm.... do you think countries like the UK will censor or ban stuff? or the ignorant/ arrogant British public will still think their country is ace regardless?? Don't forget the tide has turned, soon you will get a taste of your own medicine.
Anon - Q and A Posted 18:32 on 4 February 2010
Hi George
Please ask Mr. Cameron why the British media has a xenophobic attitude towards the chinese. It seems to me that some people think they would get brownie points for throwing off handed insults at the chinese. I refer of course to factions within the BBC and the Daily Mail in particular. I am sure it would smooth relations in the future and clear the bad air.
Anonymous Posted 13:42 on 7 February 2010
it seems to me that the Chinese absolutely cant stand any criticism whatsoever, they will defend their nation to the death even as it strangles them. Youll die for your own rhetoric and this false notion of honour you fool
Anonymous Posted 13:43 on 7 February 2010
more freedom in China? HAHAHAHAHAAHHA now that is truly hilarious
Anonymous Posted 22:21 on 8 February 2010
There could be a very good debate here but sadly some people don't respect the etiquette in standard polite discussion and reduce arguments to simple extremes and perhaps provocation. If you are chinese as I am living in the UK it is an interesting topic to discuss and bounce off, because it affects you and other chinese around you and how non-chinese people perceive you. I have got a lot of respect Mr Lee in defending a opinion very well, which is rare for chinese people in the public eye.
sceptic Posted 21:42 on 10 February 2010
I doubt George Lee had anything to do with that article, its far too polished and balanced. A nice bit of PR spin I think. Still at least the Tories get their Token asian man in the cabinet
Yellow Fever - A third way Posted 3:05 on 16 February 2010
We can all agree on the fact that Akmal Shaikh was caught in possession of 4kg of heroin when he tried to enter China.

The Labour Government and Reprieve made numerous applications for clemency, which proved to be futile at the end.

If the Government and Reprieve were so determined to save Skaikh's life, why did they not table an offer to take Skaikh back to serve his sentence in a UK prison?

The cases of Samantha Orobator (caught with heroin in Laos and fell pregnant while in Laos custody) and Michael Shields (Liverpool fan convicted attempted murder in Bulgaria) were two examples where UK nationals were brought back to the UK to serve out their sentences in a UK prison and in Shield's case even a full pardon.

Bringing back UK nationals convicted abroad has precedence. Why was this not offered in this case?

Was it because the Labour Government and Reprieve were too stubborn in their pursuit to get Shaikh clemency that they were blinded to this obvious solution?

Personally, I think he got what he deserved. He was caught red handed.
Write comment
Name:
Subject:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
If you are unable to read the security code, please send your comment to This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it .
Security Code:
Type the code in the image
(helps prevent spam)
Security Image