| The More, The Merrier |
|
|
|
| Features | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Wednesday, 30 April 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I currently live in Albany in Upstate New York, a medium-sized city three hours north of Manhattan and the state capital. Coming here several years ago, I knew nobody - no contacts, no friends, no family. The girlfriends I've made over the years have become like my family. I write about them in "Coffee Mates", my blog on Spotlightnews.com, one of the local newspapers. We became friends before we had children and one by one we had our first child and soon enough our second and then we said we were done. To my surprise, two announced their third pregnancy this year. Baby "Boomlet"How appropriate then in light of the current U.S. baby boom; well technically a "boomlet " meaning a small and brief baby boom. Demographers say it's too soon to tell whether it's a trend. According to the National Center for Health Statistics in its initial analysis of 2006 birth data, the United States has experienced a milestone, its highest number of births in 35 years. Not since 1971 has the total fertility rate - the total number of live births per 1,000 women in the age group of 15 to 44 - surpassed 2.1. This is the "magic" number called the replacement rate for a developed country to maintain current population levels without putting a strain on national resources. Some experts think it's more a case of many women in the U.S. having two children each, rather than a smaller number having several children. I'm aware I've contributed to the statistics by having 2 children in my mid- to late-30s in the last 5-years. Current birth rates are up for nearly every age group, from women in their teens to early-40s and in most racial or ethnic groups, making the U.S. stand out among industrialized nations. The total fertility rates in many of the most developed countries are some of the lowest in the world - in Italy and Spain it's at 1.29; Japan at 1.23 and Singapore at 1.07 (2006 figures). The "Magic" 2.1Without the 2.1 replacement rate in developed countries, there may come a time when there aren't enough people to fill jobs and pay into the system to support the elderly. By 2050, demographers project there'll be one person of working age for every two people aged 65 or over in the EU . By 2105, Japan is projected to lose half its population . https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/2005/RAND_RB9126.pdf Reasons for U.S. Baby BoomExperts can't pinpoint the exact reason for the higher birth rates in the United States, but suggest a mix of reasons. Some of the increase is due to rising immigration - Hispanics have the highest fertility levels, about 2.9. But this isn't the determining factor, as there are increases in other racial or ethnic groups. And the fertility rate of non-Hispanic whites at 1.9 is still higher than that of other industrialized countries. Perhaps, it's due to the 24/7 economy with relatively large numbers of part-time jobs and shift work and a culture that ensures women can have children and work outside the home without any stigma attached, along with American men sharing in the raising of children. Or maybe, in certain parts of the country, it's the emphasis on religion and the importance of family that contributes to higher fertility rates coupled with limited access to abortions in some states and recent declines in contraceptive use. We Can't Afford Children, Can We?Wouldn't the present doom and gloom - U.S. dollar plunge, severe slump in the housing market, subprime mortgage crisis, higher costs of living - deter Americans from having children? You'd think they would reconsider having a larger family when in 2004 the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimated it would cost $184,320 to raise a child from birth through to age 17 for a family making $41,700 to $70,200. Right from the start, parents realize the cost of buying and caring for a child. Witness the strong growth in premium baby gear from pushchairs to cots that are works of art. I asked my cousin's wife, a pushchair designer for a leading British baby goods retailer what the high-end "must-haves" are for the new mother. As parents, would you pay the going rate in the U.S. of $900 for the Bugaboo "Cameleon" pushchair or the Stokke cot - the choices of celebrity mums? It Doesn't Matter about the MoneyFaced with the economic reality of having children, I was surprised by the U.S. birth rate statistics. I asked my two friends who are expecting their third child and other women I know in Albany who have three or more children why they decided to have more than two and whether economic factors affected their decision. I spoke to six women in total, and most of them said they didn't feel their family was complete with two children. Two had twins the first time around and wanted to enjoy a second pregnancy. Most were in agreement with their partners about having three or more children. One couple did have concerns about the environmental implications of having a larger family, given that the U.S. is the major consumer of scarce resources. They had many discussions before they could agree on having another child. Friends and family were generally supportive of the women having another child. Reactions ranged from surprise because of their age at their third or fourth pregnancy (late-30s) to concern about how they would cope with several children close in age. The women felt public perception of larger families is mostly positive. Now three children are seen as standard with four being considered large. There were a few negatives: It's easier to accommodate two children - the family-of-four holidays is the "special" - and families with four or more children are often not invited to functions because they bring too many children. Yes, they were most concerned about paying for university, but the economy didn't deter them from having more children. And they absolutely were not influenced to buy luxury brands. All bought within their means with safety being the main issue and the purchase of new clothes, if they were having a child of the opposite sex. Friends and family gave gifts and they used hand-me-downs. What's the Story Elsewhere?I was interested in comparing the fertility rates in the UK and Hong Kong since I have a special affinity to both places. My parents emigrated from Hong Kong to the UK in the early 1960s. I was born, raised and educated in England, and worked in different parts of the UK for 12 years. The UK StoryThe UK is experiencing its own small baby boom. The Office of National Statistics reported a 26-year high in the UK's fertility rate based on its 2006 figures . On average, women are having 1.87 children compared to the all-time low of 1.63 in 2001. This is still below the replacement rate of 2.1, but it does show the population is currently still growing. Factors that may explain the increased fertility rate, particularly in the 25- to 29-year-old age group, include changes in maternity leave; tax and benefits for parents and the impact of recent immigration to the UK. More interesting to me was the rise in older women having children. The highest percentage increase of birth rates was that of the 35- to 39-year-old age group - 7 percent in one year. And, in the last 20 years, the fertility rate has doubled for women aged 40 and over. Some experts suggest that changes in university admissions in the 1980s meant more women went to university and they delayed having children, unlike earlier generations. That argument makes sense to me, as I was university educated in the1980s, focused on my career, delayed marriage and, if I were still living in the UK, I would have been one of those women who delayed having children until their mid- to late-30s. And in Hong KongI was really surprised with the total fertility rate of 0.98 in Hong Kong - the bottom of the world's fertility league. Surprised because I was brought up with an assumption about the importance of family and, therefore, having children in the Chinese culture. But thinking about it, I'm not too surprised, as many of my female relatives and British-born Chinese and Chinese women friends in Hong Kong are financially independent, career-focused and dating. Even with low-paid domestic help, Hong Kong's highly educated women have a preference for few if any children. Physical factors such as high property prices may be a constraint in having a larger family, but there's also another material factor - women outnumber men in Hong Kong. Hong Kong's 2006 census shows 912 men for every 1,000 women. By 2036, the gap will widen to a ratio of 763:1,000. Given this statistic, you'd think that Hong Kong men have a large pool of women to choose from in their marriage partners, but since 2001, there's been an 80 percent increase in Hong Kong men choosing to marry mainland Chinese women. In 2006, 28,000 Hong Kong men married mainland women as opposed to 6,500 Hong Kong women choosing a mainland partner. This dispels the assumption that Hong Kong women would look to find partners in mainland China with the ratio of men to women there of 119:100. Many Hong Kong women, being financially independent, well educated and assertive, do not consider marriage as economic security and may hold negative stereotypes about mainland men being patriarchal and traditional. Long-term, the fertility rate in Hong Kong is expected to drop to 0.9 over the next 30 years. By 2036, half the population will be above 46 years of age. TrendsThe U.S. and UK's rising fertility rates - a trend, a boomlet or a singular blip? It's a case of watch and see. Hong Kong's Chief Executive Donald Tsang has a goal of encouraging couples to have 3 children in order for the city to grow to 10 million people to become a financial hub to rival New York and London. Critics think this goal is absurd giving the shortage of space to sustain its population. Others think there's room for development in the New Territories and outlying islands. In 2006, 46 percent of babies born in Hong Kong had mainland mothers. To achieve Tsang's vision, some experts say more mainland people, pregnant or not, should be welcomed in Hong Kong instead of being turned away at the border. Stability versus OverpopulationSociologists, demographers and economists argue that developed countries need to reach the replacement rate of 2.1 in order to achieve population stability; increased productivity and economic growth, and maintain the solvency of pensions and social insurance systems. Other experts make the case for overpopulation controls, not only in developing nations, particularly Sub-Saharan Africa, which has some of the highest total fertility rates in the world, but also in the industrialized nations. Overpopulation is generally defined as the number of people in a region relative to its resources and the capability of the region's environment to sustain human activities. Sustainability is a crucial factor in the issue of population growth in the face of current food shortages in many countries; world-wide increases in food prices and a lack of cheap food. Since 2005, the cost of staples has risen 80 percent. My staple is definitely rice and it concerns me the price of rice is the highest it's been for 19-years. Your Thoughts PleaseTo have, or not to have children: that is the question. 2.1 or none - What do you think? Please share your views below or e-mail Susan directly here This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it . Susan S. Cheung
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||








Despite the shaky economy, American couples are increasingly choosing to have bigger families. Not so in many countries of the European Union (EU) and in East Asia with 
