Dimsum masthead
Home arrow Features arrow Chinese vase sale
Chinese vase sale PDF Print E-mail
Features
Sunday, 21 November 2010

A MULTI-BILLIONAIRE Chinese industrialist has paid an incredible £53,000,000 at a London auction for a Qianlong Dynasty vase, just 16 inches tall.
The industrialist, who has giant projects in Beijing, Shanghai and other big cities, sent his representative to bid a world-record price for a Chinese artefact.
Young, long-haired and wearing jeans, the successful bidder was given a front-row seat on a gilded couch before the auction started.
There were seven serious bidders, all of them Chinese, for the elaborately-decorated vase, with its iconic ovoid body covered by porcelain lattice work half-hiding a smaller intricate urn.
The vase was owned by Qianlong, the fourth emperor of the Qing Dynasty and dates back to at least the 1740s. It was illegally smuggled out of China at the end of the Second Opium War in 1860, probably by a British Army officer, when Imperial palaces in Beijing were ransacked and looted.
Nobody knows how the vase ended up in a modest bungalow in suburban Pinner, north-west London in the 1930s. For decades, it was used as a book end and left to gather dust on the top shelf of a wooden bookcase, after a well-known television antiques expert said it was a clever fake.
The owner of the vase died several years ago and his widow passed away shortly after. It was only when their son and daughter were clearing out the house that the vase was taken to their local auctioneers, Bainbridges, of Ruislip.
As experts studied the item, it became clear that here was a genuine Chinese antiquity, a real treasure. An initial value of £1,000,000 was placed on the elaborately-decorated relic.
But as more cultural heritage historians and academics examined the artefact, valuations increased dramatically.
A Bainbridges official wrote on his small company’s website: “I can’t easily explain the excitement that is building up here in Ruislip” – a statement which may never be repeated in this sleepy, working-class town which boasts that it’s the home to Eastcote Hockey Club and which has High Street buildings yawningly called The Swan and The Duck House.
At the auction, there was frenzy and mounting excitement as bids crackled skywards, at the astonishing rate of £1,000,000 a time. Somebody offered to pay £5,000,000 – but then the real, determined bidders stepped in and the price shot up to 10, 20, 30, 35 and way past £40,000,000.
After 30 minutes of one of the most astonishing auctioneering sessions ever seen, the hammer came down – and with commission and Value Added Tax, the small case cost the buyer a mind-bogling £53,000,000.
Some big newspapers said the buyer was the Chinese Government. But I find this suggestion absurd – I do not believe the staid, old-guard directors of the State Cultural Relics Bureau on Beijing would ever despatch a young, long-haired man wearing jeans to London to spend 560,835,000 Renminbi of the Government’s money. And a Government representative would not agree to sit in the limelight in the front of the auction house, with cameras peering at him.
I fancy the bidder was the son of an industrialist who failed to buy another Qianlong Dynasty vase which was sold at auction in Hong Kong earlier this year for a mere £20,000,000. Dad’s instruction to his son was probably: “Don’t come back from London without THIS vase – pay as much as you need.” So, the vase may now be sitting in the billionaire’s dining room, an interesting conversation piece when wealthy friends come over for a meal.
The identities of the lucky brother and sister who sold the relic are also being secret, but they are probably currently on holidays in the Caribbean sun and buying lottery tickets with lots of 8s.
Few people know this, but the British Museum has scores of relics, looted from palaces, Government buildings, mansions, museums, tombs and monasteries, hidden away in their secret vaults. The artefacts were smuggled out of China by British explorers, adventurers, treasure hunters and Army officers and soldiers.
The British Museum told me that their Chinese art works include Buddhist scrolls, paintings, documents and books from the Dunhuang Caves. Some of the items were simply stolen, others were handed over by monks for gifts of food, Western trinkets and small amounts of money.
The museum refuses to hand back a single item to China – just as it refuses to return the Elgin Marbles to Greece, or the hieroglyphic-busting Rosetta Stone back to Egypt.
Museum officials say its China Gallery is not large enough to exhibit all their Chinese masterpieces. The artefacts in vaults are not easily-accessed by the public, but can be studied by historians, academics and scholars.
China last year set up a Chinese Cultural Relics Recovery Programme to boomerang heritage treasures back to China and its people. The United Nations estimates that there are 167,000,000 historic national relics in 200 museums in 43 different countries – and most have been stolen and illegally smuggled out of their countries of origin.
In the meantime, souvenir collectors all over Britain are examining their oriental urns and vases – but whether they find another valuable ancient Chinese container is a matter of pot luck.
ALFRED LEE
This email address is being protected from spam bots, you need Javascript enabled to view it
 
Comments
Add NewSearchRSS
Keiko - Vase Posted 23:31 on 21 November 2010
It is a beautiful piece and I am pleased to hear it has been returned to China. I just hope the poor young man did not drop it on the way home.

I think what is nice it that it is good condition and obviously well looked after. If it had not been in the UK it would have been doubtless broken during the Cultural Revolution so don't judge the British too harshly.

Objects are returned when ownership can be proved. In most cases whilst it is maybe nice to think it was stolen during wars in practice the ownership is probably difficult to prove and may have been sold in historical times or passed through several hands each person believing it was a legal transaction.
Zhao - Self vs others Posted 12:31 on 22 November 2010
re: your point about the Cultural Revolution, Keiko:

I don't know if it would have been smashed. As far as I know, the Palace Musuem was protected.

On a deeper level, is it better that you smashed your own things according to your own will, or is it better to let some bandits to come in to your home, beat you and rob you, and then preserve your things for you, to your humiliation, then for you to buy them back later?

I'd rather smash my own things, than suffering such humiliation - pride is worth more than money.
anon - £53m? Posted 20:15 on 23 November 2010
Can anyone pronounce Qianlong dynasty with confidence and know which period it refer to?
Keiko - Smashing pots Posted 21:16 on 23 November 2010
Chi-An Long. 1736-1795.

But did bandits come in and steal it? We don't know. We just like to assume the worst to appeal to our historic sense of being victims.

I for one am glad it wasn't smashed and was looked after and China can now afford to buy it with a clean heart.
Zhao - Smashing old to build the new Posted 10:35 on 24 November 2010
re: Keiko

It is important to remember being a victim so that such victimhood would not be allowed to be repeated again to oneself, or that such victimisation would not be imposed on others.

Of course there are many causes and effects which in the end somehow "work out", but I don't think the end could justify the means, and somehow we should be thankful about the means. Without a decaying China, the Western Powers would not have smashed their way through. Without the Western Powers' acts, there would not have been the realisation to change e.g. May 4th. Without the Western Concessions e.g. Shanghai and Hong Kong, Chinese revolutionaries would have had nowhere to hide. Without having been hiding themselves from the Chinese authorities, there'd have been no Republic of China. Without the Japanese aggression, it would be questionable if the Communists could have survived. Without the Communists having survived, there'd be no People's Republic. Without the People's Republic, there'd be no today's China (of course today's China has many good and bad bits). So, if we take some of the good things about China today, should we thank the decaying Qing Dynasty, the Western Powers and the Japanese aggression?
anon - £53m? Posted 12:20 on 24 November 2010
I got it Qi is pronounce Chi as in energy. What about the Qing dynasty? Is that pronounced Chi-ng, ie ng as is ing but more nasal?
1736-1795 Any significant event happened than?
anon - £53m? Posted 12:30 on 24 November 2010
Is Qianlong 2 syllables or 3 syllables?
Is Qing 1 syllable or 2 syllables?
Zhao - Pronounciation and evenets Posted 14:05 on 24 November 2010
(1) pronounciation

To me, the Wade-Giles system, although relatively easy to use, is poor. Pinyin is the only way. Put it the other way, Wade-Giles is like writing Han characters to inform the reader on how to pronouce English words. The result is very crass.

Qian Long has two syllables. Qing has one.

The current pinyin system is problematic, to me, in that one compound word should be "coded" together, and hence Qianlong, the name, should be one Romantised word. However, in reality, it has two Han characters, each with an individual meaning, with a combined meaning when put togehter. One Han character has only one syllable

(2) events

Emperor Qianlong was one of the most illustrious emperors in Chinese history.

In terms of governance, during his reign, the empire had its rebellious elements pacified (or devastatingly crushed) and the frontiers were consolidated (or managed to grab more land for the empire).

In terms of culture, a catalogue of all important (important for whom, I wonder) was commissioned, preserving numerous historical books. (Interesting to note that some of the volumes were later burnt.)

Of the most interest to the British was the visit of Lord Macartney to the Qing court. There he was instructed to kowtow to the emperor, but Macartney refused. This story is repeated time and time again in the British press when talking about British-China relationships today. One of the most critical journalists of China, Jane MacCartney of the Times, I think, is a descendent of Lord Macartney.
Keiko - Kowtow Posted 18:44 on 24 November 2010
I have never heard the one about Lord MaCartney but I have heard the one about when the British Queen visted China in October 1986 a Chinese Interpreter refused to bow to the Queen as Chinese People bow to no one. This was a serious breach of protocol but she was not punished for it and the British accepted the sentiment. It is good that we are all equal under the Law today.
Zhao - kowtow vs bow Posted 12:07 on 25 November 2010
Well, the interpreter's refusal (which I'm sure was at the instruction from, if not then with the approval of, higher authorities) was probably a retaliation of Lord Macartney's refusal to kowtow. It was probably also a triumphant "finger in the air" as the the Joint Declaration over Hong Kong was signed in 1984.

As for equality under the "law", in international relations, althought here are laws, but the real "law" is "power". Just look at the number of big unilateral actions taken by various big powers, namely the US today with a few countries following its lead.
Keiko - Interpreter Posted 20:00 on 25 November 2010
I have spoken to the interpreter concerned about the incident a few years back. Her name is quite well known. She told me it was nothing political. It was just something that felt "right" to her at the time. No grand guestures, no retaliation for some long dead issue, just a human feeling.

Not everything is the result of International plots. Quite often individuals do surprising things.
Only registered users can write comments!